🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that indecision over how to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.